Robert Bork was an American public servant born on March 1, 1927. He is known for his work as a judge and legal scholar, particularly for his role in the U.S. Supreme Court nomination process in the 1980s. Bork's legal philosophy and writings have influenced discussions on constitutional law and judicial interpretation. He is remembered for his contributions to legal thought and public service.

"Those who made and endorsed our Constitution knew man's nature, and it is to their ideas, rather than to the temptations of utopia, that we must ask that our judges adhere."



"I don't think the Constitution is studied almost anywhere, including law schools. In law schools, what they study is what the court said about the Constitution. They study the opinions. They don't study the Constitution itself."



"The notion that Congress can change the meaning given a constitutional provision by the Court is subversive of the function of judicial review; and it is not the less so because the Court promises to allow it only when the Constitution is moved to the left."



"An egalitarian educational system is necessarily opposed to meritocracy and reward for achievement. It is inevitably opposed to procedures that might reveal differing levels of achievement."



"When a judge assumes the power to decide which distinctions made in a statute are legitimate and which are not, he assumes the power to disapprove of any and all legislation, because all legislation makes distinctions."



"The right to procreate is not guaranteed, explicitly or implicitly, by the Constitution."

